
How do we redesign the operating model while the business keeps running?
Decisions take three committees. A customer request crosses four teams before anyone owns it. The sustainability review was bolted on top of the investment process, outside it, so each project passes twice. Reporting loops produce numbers and no decisions. The people are good and the strategy is clear. The organisation was built for a company half this size, in a market that moved slower, with one product where there are now five.
The cost is an invisible tax: paid in weeks, in rework, in the decisions reversed because the people who would have objected were consulted afterwards. A fund sees it as EBITDA left in the structure. A COO sees it as the reason the strategy approved in January is still a slide in September. A CHRO sees it in the exit interviews.
What to rebuild, in what order, without stopping the machine.
Less than the leadership team fears. The temptation is a full reorganisation, announced on a Monday, which produces six months of distraction and a new chart with the old frictions inside it. The decision is which flows are actually blocking the strategy, which frictions protect quality and which protect the past, then which sequence of changes to structure, decision rights and rhythms removes the drag while revenue keeps coming in. And where to put responsibility in the new design: inside the decision, where it removes rework, rather than on top of it, where it adds a layer.
The work is Agile Operating Model Rebuild. It redesigns what is blocking you, and leaves the organisation chart alone unless it is the blockage.
We diagnose the drag first: the decision flows, the approval chains, the coordination costs, the reporting loops, each with a time and a cost attached. For the COO this is the diagnostic of your own frictions, not a benchmark; for a fund after acquisition it is the operational due diligence that should have been done before close, run fast enough to feed the hundred-day plan; for the CHRO the organisational frictions are mapped with the process ones, role overlaps, unclear accountabilities, layers that produce paralysis. For a scale-up appointing its first COO it separates what the founders built informally and must now be formalised from the bureaucracy the company was created to escape.
Then we rebuild: structure, decision rights, team configuration, the rhythms by which the company decides, with the responsibility screens placed inside the decisions that need them and removed from the ones that do not. Each change is tested against the speed the market demands, the cost base and the people actually available. Digital and AI changes are integrated here instead of afterwards, because a new tool on an old process is a faster version of the old problem. The model is built with the people who will run it; a rebuild done to a workforce produces exactly the friction it set out to remove.
What leaves the room is the transition plan: the new design, the decision rights matrix, the implementation sequence by quarter, the change protocol and the indicators that govern the transition. For a fund the milestones are mapped on the value creation plan; for a scale-up the plan is written to be run without a dedicated change team.
In the case below we put a number on the distance between the strategy a company has approved and the organisation it is still running. We show how that distance is paid each quarter in slower decisions and lost margin. The rebuild is the way to stop paying it.
Strategy is updated. Structure is not. The gap compounds quietly until execution fails visibly.
ReadMaxime Ferrand, Senior Partner. Sixteen years at Enedis across innovation, digital transformation, risk management and EV-charging deployment, from engineering projects to Chief of Staff. He holds the rebuild: how a large organisation changes its structure and its rhythms while it keeps delivering, day after day.
Fabrice Macarty, Founder, CEO. He works with leadership teams on the business models their organisations have to carry. On this situation he holds the link between the model and the strategy: which decisions the new design has to make faster and which it has to stop making twice.
A more resilient operating system raises the yield of each unit of effort invested in growth. An operating model is the most literal form that sentence takes.
Read the principle in Our Approach: The force multiplierThe three committees, the request that crosses four teams, the strategy still on a slide in September. Tell us where it binds and we will tell you where to start.